Honouring a Classic

A Beginner's Guide to Effective Email

This is a link to Kaitlin Duck Sherwood's classic and once rather useful guide. Effective Email is not a bad title.  It is, in hindsight an idealistic paper, honourable because of that but also impractical & frustrating.  There is an ideology about email embedded in the work that we now know will remain an ideal. In 2006 this 2000 document is dated.  It is dated not just because it is from the last century or because of new technology (it is somewhat technology neutral, but technology has surpassed these older ideas) but mainly because something completely new is needed

    * to relate to the reality of actual practice
    * to grapple with ineffective practices and fallacies  that have gained more popularity

For example there is a link to a page by Kaitlin Duck Sherwood on Email Overload. Which has a range of tips, some better than others but which is flawed in its attitude to the question.  Even in its title.

There is no such thing as email overload, any more than that there is a library overload, or an art gallery overload, information overload or a shortage of time, or difficult problems… you get the idea, own the challenge, don’t be a victim to abundance in the world; be wise to the flow of stuff.

I am planning some posts here around Email Intelligence.  I want to find the central principles of wise email practices.

This is not a trivial thing, a good practitioner would be a back belt in communication, there would be personal fitness combined with a thorough tradition, and like judo would use the energy in the "enemy" as a source of strength, as a friend.  There may be a bigger topic here – the art of communication in the digital era.  I will however focus (slowly I'm afraid) on principles and practices related to email.  And in case you have not spotted, I am already indebted to David Allen's GTD tradition in my thinking here. They are good on email practice, and I also see limitations.

I recall some earlier posts on this theme.  I will go back & tag some old posts.

A third wave of Jungian thought?

A Review of “Dialectics and Analytical Psychology: The El Capitan Canyon Seminar” – CG Jung Page:

Miller insists that Giegerich’s thought is not a negation of what Hillman’s archetypal theorizing had accomplished, “but rather a call to continue it radically in an attempt to complete it in its and Jung’s own spirit, an anima-psychology sublated by an animus-psychology.” Giegerich does not deny that the soul is image, Miller writes, but insists that “The soul always thinks.”

Defence against pain

Here is another Audio (9.56 min):

Audio Blog post – at Odeo

Shownotes:
Thanks Dan for your response.

Maybe my reticence is not for professional reasons … a defence – See Freud's list here on Wikipedia

What are defenses about & for?

What about James Hillman's Acorn Theory

Whatever I am defended about there is also a need to find a way through some genuine difficulties.

Also mentioned:

Sukie Colegrave – By Way of Pain

Sukie Colegrave – Uniting Heaven & Earth

~

Sub to Psyberspace, the Podcast:

My Odeo Podcast

Podcast

Playing around with Odio. The audio snip in the last post in now in a new RSS feed called Psyberspace. Who knows what will come of it all. I have done this before, early in 2005 but it is easier now! Also it may be that I can find my voice in that sphere where cyber and psyche meet. It may be that it will sit well with my professional life.

Finding my voice

Five minutes of Audio. 

http://odeo.com/audio/1334564/view [Dead – but found the audio file.]

voice

Some audio about finding my writer’s, my blogger’s voice. And the “show notes” follow:

My envy of Dan’s voice: http://dan.randow.net.nz/

Ref to a books I mention: …. Can’t find “I had the Time” maybe it does not exist!

Yalom, Orbach, though these are not good examples as they are professional books. Exposing for all that.

Some talk about pseudonyms.

Reference to Identity blogging & naked blogging

*

Friday, 10 September 2021

Repaired this post.

Found the Full Circle page and saved (private) it here: https://psyberspace.walterlogeman.com/2021/identity-blogging-bloging-while-naked/

Yalom interviews Zerka Moreno

Psychotherapy.net Interviews, Therapist of the Month

Piercing Quotes from Zerka!

“Spontaneity is a new response to an old situation or an adequate response to a new situation.”

“A person who is mentally ill is a creator who got stuck.”

“We can’t give up our unfinished business, but must bring it to fruition and respectability.”

“The word is not the route to the psyche; in the beginning was not the word, but the act.”

“How delicate is this bridge. We’re all broken and need to become more cohesive, more integrated from within. Through the catharsis of integration, we become balanced within and without”

“Don’t think that because you build up a scene you’ve got to stick to it. You can change scenes. It’s a moving panorama.”

Vision & Hope

E-Myth Worldwide:

A business without a vision is directionless. It lacks purpose. It lacks the essential idea from which commitment, growth, and the sense of personal achievement arrive and flourish. But a vision without a plan is only a hope. A vision needs a plan to make it come alive, to make it a reality.


A nice quote & bigger than just a business slogan. Kate & I have been working on our business  plan & Kate made a good distinction between Vision & Strategic Objective.
 The Vision is how it Looks. The Strategic Objective  includes the hidden means, it is like the difference behoove the picture of a house and the sketches of how the details work under the tiles & the cladding.

Nice site for quotes

Aristotle Quotes:

Love is composed of a single soul inhabiting two bodies. Aristotle

This one sums up something wonderful! Moreno has the notion of the co-unconscious and Harville Hendix the “Imago match” but Aristotle already had the idea.

Freud’s Birthday – he had a really good insight

Psychotherapy still booming 150 years after Freud’s birth:

‘Freud once called psychotherapy a secular kind of pastoral care,’ said the WCP president. In a time when religion doesn’t have the same importance as before, people look to therapists to help them find meaning.

Freud’s fundamental contribution to the development of treatment methods is little disputed today, despite rival schools of thought.

Eric Kandel, American neuroscientist and Nobel Prize winner for his research into memory, calls the ‘father of psychoanalysis’ a ‘giant’ and the greatest research scientist of the 20th century.

This all makes good sense. Somewhere, usually well hidden, inside us, are other autonomous entities & intelligences that influence our lives. That was Freud’s main insight and it is hard to imagine a world where that was not seen as an ordianry fact of life. I’m still reading When Nietzsche Wept and the whole story is set at the time of the birth of that insight. In this WCP (World Council of Psychotherapy) item they call Freud a great researcher.  Right.  To research something so unlike the material world is a daring & tricky thing, but it is research – Freud thought of every analysis as a form of research.  (Where is a reference to that in his writing?)