Just upgraded my old Agent as i am back in XP as I am having a few problems in Linux right now. Thhis is a nice story. I can get by in Windows with the likes of Agent and Mozilla – which is a great browser.
76756025
“Do the demands of the GPL cause as much harm as closed-source code?”
Interesting discussion on going into the use of dual licences etc. following what is a flawed opening article. I have a great respect for that GPL! That people cheat and close it off is a sad thing though. Apparently it is easy enough to do a string search to see if that has happened.
76755762
“Linux will always be more than the sum of its egos”
This is a rejoinder to the Metcalf thing. I know these are old articles… but I like that about the web – it persists (when it does not rot).
Open-sores ideology
Linux’s ’60s technology, open-sores ideology won’t beat W2K, but what will?
Sad story – how can a bright man be so thick really. He seems not to grasp Free Software, Open Source any better than Marx Lenin or Trotski – and he wants the Pulizter prize?
Sunday, July 18, 2010
76706750
Semantic Web
Mercury News | 05/11/2002 | Dan Gillmor: Web pioneer looks at ground covered, future
Tim Berners-Lee:
“Assuming we don’t cripple technology, tomorrow’s Web will be dramatically different from today’s. What we have today is a human-readable system, a good one. The coming Web will also be machine-readable, Berners-Lee says, and the implications are enormous.
“This new Web, which Berners-Lee and others call the “Semantic Web,” will be an overlay on the current one. Its most prominent feature will be machines communicating with other machines on our behalf, using tools now under development.
“After his keynote speech, Berners-Lee was asked to describe his view of the future Internet. It will be vastly more flexible and useful than today, he said.
“Our connections will be omnipresent, he said. The context of what we’re doing virtually will move with us from one physical location to another.
“The potential seems unlimited, he said, provided we give innovators a cleanly designed, unencumbered platform on which to make their miracles. We’re in the early days, and that’s exciting to contemplate.”
The context of what we’re doing virtually will move with us from one physical location to another.
That is the line that intigues me and of course that Tim Berners-Lee said it. It is still hard to envisage – because what if the cat-door opening mechanism crashes phenomena, it might kill the cat. Sometimes it might be best done really simply! I hanker after technology that is simple. I wish Deskview had worked!
Every email is a significant act
E-Mail Notification Management
“I like to impose this extra bit of protocol on myself, to underscore that every e-mail is a significant act.”
Jon Udell is one of the few writers who takes a real interest in how our emails work, how groups work online. His column “Tangled in the treads” for Byte always has a good take on this or that aspect of online collaboration. I don’t always agree with the details (or understand the hi-tech stuff) but “that every e-mail is a significant act.” is a fine principle.
This article is about his first look at Outlook.
May the blogs be with you
Salon.com Technology | Use the blog, Luke
“The collective future of blogs lies not in dethroning the New York Times — but in becoming a force that can make sense of the Web’s infinity of links.”
The noosphere will not be built by the NYT. The shape and flow of the networks of links is not just a big wide web, there are forces in various directions – there dynamic, a struggle for outcome. Blogs are part of the benign side. A force for freedom of expression.
Living Vicariously
Forster, E. M. (Edward Morgan): The Machine Stops Literature Annotations
Another prophetic writer… hit on the idea of movies and email before WW1. Upholds the notion that we are better off not living vicariously with the aid of machines. Does he have a point? Makes me think of the Lunig cartoon of the family watching the sunset on TV while it is happening outside the window.
Maybe there is a point to it. As in: Joyce Kilmer. 18861918
119. Trees
I THINK that I shall never see
A poem lovely as a tree.
A tree whose hungry mouth is prest
Against the sweet earth’s flowing breast;
A tree that looks at God all day, 5
And lifts her leafy arms to pray;
A tree that may in summer wear
A nest of robins in her hair;
Upon whose bosom snow has lain;
Who intimately lives with rain. 10
Poems are made by fools like me,
But only God can make a tree.
But what if we reversed the idea:
I THINK that I shall never see a tree lovely as a poem.
In a poem the tree becomes sacred.
We spend a lot of time here in space looking at words – and somehow that seems important… to be in the noosphere. We value nature but travel to see art galleries.
We make God in our image of God.
76427612
CMC Magazine: Technology as a Psychic Phenomenon
“Nevertheless, there are relationships, significant but covert, between the psychic and the technological. The key to this relationship lies in McLuhan’s idea of the “extensions of man.” The psychic and the technological represent two forms of the human attempt to abolish the constraints of time and space. We can, in fact, say with reason that technology represents the material expression or analogue of certain alleged psychic powers.”
In this 1997 article Grosso, in the end, dismisses the thesis. It seems to me that the trouble with techno-spiritual thesis like most religions is that it is taken all too literally. When that happens, as in this item, the essence of insight is lost. Resurrection is a potent notion – taken too literally it becomes the debate about ontology and the miracle is lost.