Role Systems

I’m a Propegator and a Stabeliser (re posting a post below for the sake of posterity, in the fear the original may go before my copy.   And a Facilitator… actually all of the roles apply to me.  I am posting this to integrate it with the psychodramatic approach to roles.  I have also been listening to an audio:

Richard

A description of the IFS model from his website is pasted below.

Conceptual Framework for Online Identity Roles � emergent by design:

August 4, 2010

by Venessa Miemis

I just wrapped up a final project for an aesthetics course this semester, the assignment being to create a �Database of the Self.� I chose to make the database as a representation of the roles we play in terms of how we interact with information online. The roles are overlaid on a panarchy, which shows a visualization of adaptive lifecycles. Though the evolution of every idea or meme won�t necessarily follow this specific path, (it may in fact be rhizomatic, with multiple feedback loops), this begins to flesh out what we become as nodes within an enmeshed series of networks.

The cycle can be thought to begin with the �Activators,� in the lower right side of image.

For an interactive version of the graphic, click here. (Thanks to @gavinkeech for transforming my sketches into the web page). Scroll over the icons for descriptions and traits of each role to pop out. Roles also listed below.

I found this to be an interesting exercise when thinking about the impact and influence we have on the web, and how information travels. For instance, when you RT something on Twitter, you�re fulfilling a �Propagator� function, when you�re introducing people or bridging information you�re a �Connector,� when you�re developing a new theory or model or practice, you are a �Pathfinder,� and so on. It�s a different way of thinking about our relationship with information � one that puts more control in the hands of the user verses just drowning in �information overload.� It�s also an interesting way to think about who to send information to when trying to plant seeds of information and spread ideas.

Thanks to @wildcat2030 for inspiration from Friendships in Hyperconnectivity mindmap and to @gavinkeech for visual design.

Activators are the catalysts of transformational change, manifesting new ideas.

  • traits: evolutionary creativity, novelty, experimentation, innovation, freedom, divergence

Pathfinders give meaning to information, illuminating a new direction to pursue.

  • traits: clarity, vision, inspiration, foresight, intuition

Facilitators create conditions for information to flow smoothly.

  • traits: coordination, positioning, reconfiguration

Enhancers add perspective and insight to what is already known.

  • traits: growth, resonance, supplementation

Connectors bridge structural holes and forge new pathways between information.

  • traits: adaptation, learning, unification

Propagators build momentum and accelerate the spread of information.

  • traits: mobilization, persuasion, diffusion

Amplifiers direct attention and awareness to information of potential value.

  • traits: evaluation, recognition of opportunity/risk, discernment

Assimilators show how information is implemented.

  • traits: synthesis, integration

Stabilizers maintain equilibrium and balance.

  • traits: sustainability, conservation

Disruptors draw attention to chaos and uncertainty, highlighting the potential for new growth.

  • traits: dissonance, entropy, degradation

<cycle repeats>

Observers & Scribes

  • Archivists, Spectators, Analysts, Advocates, Critics

From the IFS website:

Overview | The Center for Self Leadership:

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO THE INTERNAL FAMILY SYSTEMSSM MODEL

The IFS Model views a person as containing an ecology of relatively discrete minds, each of which has valuable qualities and each of which is designed for, and wants to play a valuable role. (For the evolution of this theory and its relation to other theories of multiplicity, see below.) These minds, or parts, are forced out of their valuable roles, however, by life experiences that reorganize the system in unhealthy ways. A good analogy is an alcoholic family, in which the children are forced into protective and stereotypic roles (the scapegoat, mascot, lost child, and so on) by the extreme dynamics of their family. But these roles do not represent the essence of the children; on the contrary, once released from his or her role by intervention, each child can find interests and talents separate from the demands of the chaotic family. The same process seems to hold true for internal families — parts are forced into extreme roles by external circumstances, but they gladly transform into moderate, more functional roles once they see that the system can safely operate that way.

What circumstances force these parts into extreme and sometimes destructive roles? Trauma is one factor, but more often it is a person’s family of origin values and interactional patterns that create internal polarizations, which escalate over time and are played out in other relationships.  Object relations and self psychology have observed these processes. What is novel about IFS is its understanding of all levels of human organization — intrapsychic, family, and culture — through the same systemic principles, and its intervention at each level with the same ecological techniques.

Parts: Managers, Firefighters, and Exiles

Most clients have parts that try to keep them functional and safe — to maintain control of their inner and outer environments. They do this, for example, by keeping them from getting too close or dependent on others, by criticizing their appearance or their performance to make them look or act better, and by taking care of others’ needs rather than their own. These parts that are in protective, managerial roles are called managers. When a person has been severely or chronically hurt, humiliated, frightened, or shamed, certain parts carry emotions, memories, and sensations from those experiences. To keep these feelings out of consciousness, managers try to keep vulnerable, needy parts locked in inner closets. These incarcerated parts are known as exiles. Whenever one of the exiles is upset to the point that it floods the person or exposes him or her to being hurt again, the third group of parts rushes to douse the inner flames of feeling, earning them the name firefighters. Highly impulsive, they push for stimulation that will override or dissociate from the exile’s feelings. Bingeing on drugs, alcohol, food, sex, or work are common firefighter activities.

The Self

The aspect of the IFS Model that differentiates it most significantly from other models is the belief that, in addition to these parts, everyone is at their core a Self. The Self has leadership and healing qualities — perspective, confidence, compassion, and acceptance — crucial to our highest, most harmonious functioning. Even the most severely abused, symptomatic clients have this healthy and healing Self, although many have very little access to it initially. The goal of IFS therapy is to differentiate this Self from the parts, thereby freeing its resources for healing by helping parts out of their extreme roles and guiding them into harmonious collaboration.

Unlike other approaches to psychotherapy, IFS has as its goal leadership by the Self of the client�s internal system of parts, and, in families, groups, and organizations, Self-leadership within each member. In contrast to other forms of psychotherapy, the IFS therapist does not have to teach clients how to correct the thoughts and emotions picked up by parts through their experiences. When clients are led by their Selves, they know, through internal communication, how to help each inner personality, what those parts need in order to feel safe, and how they can release their burdens. Led by the qualities of the Self, clients know how to provide what the parts need. The therapist�s job is to guide clients to a Self-led state in which they become therapists to their own inner families.

In interpersonal relationships, when the therapist can help family members get their parts to step back and let their Selves communicate, long-standing issues are resolved with a minimum of guidance. Rather than reacting to each other’s extreme views and positions, each Self-led person, sensing the hurt behind the protective walls of other�s parts, automatically feels empathy, just as individual clients feel for their own parts. It is the Self�s compassionate understanding of the parts� pain and shame, as well as the Self�s availability to assist the parts again and again, that is healing.

You can learn more about the Internal Family Systems Model and how to work with it in the Level 1 course in Internal Family Systems. Books, articles, and DVDs/CDs about IFS are available through the CSL Store.

Milton Glaser’s Great Rules For Life

I like his work! And these “rules” make a good read.

Nice video here. hilmancurtis

Milton Glaser’s Great Rules For Life « Saskia Wilson-Brown http://saskiawilsonbrown.com/2010/07/28/milton-glasers-great-rules-for-life/

(Sent from Flipboard)

Unfortunately in our field, in the so-called creative – I hate that word because it is misused so often. I also hate the fact that it is used as a noun. Can you imagine calling someone a creative? Anyhow, when you are doing something in a recurring way to diminish risk or doing it in the same way as you have done it before, it is clear why professionalism is not enough. After all, what is required in our field, more than anything else, is the continuous transgression. Professionalism does not allow for that because transgression has to encompass the possibility of failure and if you are professional your instinct is not to fail, it is to repeat success. So professionalism as a lifetime aspiration is a limited goal.

Diary

Found this in my jumble. Bought back the memory of that trip to Sydney

Editing Posts on this blog

It may or may not be a good practice, but I often post half finished posts, then edit later, often years later! But mostly minutes or hours later. If there has been discussion i wont tamper with the context. if it is years later i might insert a date to show the progression.

The point is that the RSS feed which sends the whole post (currently) is often the worst way to read this blog.

I will set it to post a snippet only. That way the reader will need to come to the blog, where there is often a more completed post, with more links and images. (and less bad grammar and typos).

Body and Soul

Linda Stone (reference) is aware of the changes in the body / mind in our psyberspace. She does not lament it but is inspirational as to how to drive on though the difficulties of poor breathing & posture and other negative affects on the body.

That is one of the reasons I see the iDevices as steps in the right direction. “What more screens?” Yes, one while I walk, one I can have with me to write, read and draw “Plein Air”. Liberation from the desk.

World, relationships, information, art, absorbing, creating all converging in an immersive movie of the soul.

Abstract Expressionist Women

Feature image: Joan Mitchell, Cross Section of a Bridge, 1951, oil on canvas, 79 3⁄4 × 119 3⁄4″. © Estate of Joan Mitchell.

Postage Stamps, Abstract Expressionism and Joan Mitchell:

(dead link)

The ten artists included in the stamp series are Hans Hoffman, Adolph Gottlieb, Mark Rothko, Arshile Gorky, Clyfford Still, Willem de Kooning, Barnett Newman, Jackson Pollock, Robert Motherwell and Joan Mitchell. Joan Mitchell (1925-1992) is the only woman in the group, though her contemporaries Elaine de Kooning, Helen Frankenthaler and Lee Krasner certainly could have found their way to abstract stamp glory as well. Joan Mitchell, however, is a great choice, a unique talent and appealing conversationalist as transcribed here in a 1986 interview with Linda Nochlin. Joan was born in Chicago, went East to Smith College and while there watched Rufino Tamayo paint a fresco in the art library; she returned to Chicago to study at the Art Institute, sojourned to New York then traveled to Mexico and Paris, Cuba and Haiti, then back to New York, though France would eventually become her home base.

Joan Mitchell – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

Joan Mitchell (February 12, 1925 – October 30, 1992) was a ‘Second Generation’ Abstract Expressionist painter. Along with Lee Krasner, Grace Hartigan, and Helen Frankenthaler she was one of her era’s few female painters to gain critical and public acclaim. Her paintings and editioned prints can be seen in major museums and collections across America and Europe.

Another article on Joan Mitchel:

 

https://www.artforum.com/print/202102/molly-warnock-on-the-art-of-joan-mitchell-85006

Charlotte Park: Abstract Expresionist Paintings, 1950-63 – Hamptons.com:

Charlotte Park: Abstract Expresionist Paintings, 1950-63 — By Exhibition May 25 – June 26, 2006

Charlotte Park
Untitled, ca. 1951
Oil and gouache on muslin, 22 x 30 inches
Signed lower right: C. Park

(dead Link to the painting.)

Spanierman Gallery, LLC is pleased to present Charlotte Park: Abstract Expresionist Paintings, 1950-63. Curated by the noted art critic and scholar Ronny Cohen, this exhibition presents the most extensive survey of the Abstract Expressionist art of Park to date, featuring her paintings and drawings from the 1950s through the early 1960s. Many of the works have rarely or never been on view, providing new ways of considering the artist and her oeuvre. A brochure by Cohen discussing Park, her work, and her relationship within the context of the Abstract Expressionist movement accompanies the exhibition.

Park’s dynamic all-over style of composition, with its rich repertory of abstract shapes and bold imaginings, made its appearance in the early 1950s. From the beginning she put her own personal stamp on Abstract Expressionism, demonstrating through her art how profoundly well she understood the character of the movement and its means for reshaping reality and for discovering the essence of form and content. The irregular shapes appearing initially in Park’s works have as a general antecedent, the animated forms in the emergent Abstract Expressionist paintings of the late 1940s, such as those of Mark Rothko. Eventually Park evolved these shapes into a central feature of her painterly vocabulary, and the paintings in gouache that she created in the mid-1950s, in which references to nature on eastern Long Island appear, are revealing of the emblematic kinds of meaning with which she endowed her art. The wavy lines and twisty organic shapes in her works can be seen as the marks of a lively and commanding gestural hand, while the way that these forms sweep across the brilliant surfaces of a number of her gouaches of the mid-1950s can also be taken as the fascinatingly reductive signs of the ocean, bay, and countryside of Long Island.


Later
Tuesday, 07 September 2021

Untitled, ca. 1959
Oil and oil crayon on canvas
30 1/4 × 30 1/4 in
76.8 × 76.8 cm

https://www.artsy.net/artwork/charlotte-park-untitled-37

Relational Reading

I understand something is changing in our psyche / brain with respect to focus. It is much harder to read books! There are so many articles and blog posts that lament his process. Maybe something is lost, but so much more is gained. It is a lemarkian step in our evolution. Yes we can change psyche, and do to adapt to a new environment. We have such a wonderful capacity for fluidity. I am thankful I am a creature that can evolve!

We are now differently abeled. This process is not new. Media impacts psyche. Photography changed portraiture. Writing changed the oral traditions. Cinema changed theatre. Television changed cinema. Cinematic literacy impacted on the psyche. Old movies are slow! There must be a market in re-editing them for the contemporary soul.

Books are like old movies. We have moved on. Today we read in a relational way. We read a quote by a friend from Moby Dick, with a link to the whole book, we can search for snippets, or read the condensed version, flick to a trailer of the movie, read the reviews, and search, tweet, re-tweet, Instapaper and blog as we go.

This is lamented?!

But don’t get me wrong. There is nothing that will replace a good book, or an old movie for that matter. The context has changed, expanded.

We are still learning how to be here.

~

There are items like this one on how to train yourself to be in the dark:

http://infovegan.com/2010/07/26/how-to-focus

Like all exercise, different kinds of workouts work differently for different people. For me, interval training works wonders— this blog post, for instance, has taken me 70 minutes to research and write — ordinarily a blog post like this before I had this set-up would take me nearly a full day’s worth of work. More importantly though, I’m able to do things like read long articles or even academic papers — things I never used to “have time for” which really meant “had attention for.”

Look at the words in this: Distracted, shattered…

Author Nicholas Carr: The Web Shatters Focus, Rewires Brains | Magazine http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/05/ff_nicholas_carr/all/1

The Internet is an interruption system. It seizes our attention only to scramble it. There’s the problem of hypertext and the many different kinds of media coming at us simultaneously. There’s also the fact that numerous studies—including one that tracked eye movement, one that surveyed people, and even one that examined the habits displayed by users of two academic databases—show that we start to read faster and less thoroughly as soon as we go online. Plus, the Internet has a hundred ways of distracting us from our onscreen reading. Most email applications check automatically for new messages every five or 10 minutes, and people routinely click the Check for New Mail button even more frequently. Office workers often glance at their inbox 30 to 40 times an hour. Since each glance breaks our concentration and burdens our working memory, the cognitive penalty can be severe.

(via Instapaper)

Walter